USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Important

USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Important

USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Important

USDA announced its newest set of Dietary Guidelines last month, and the new standards are shamefully incomplete.

So, what’s missing?

As Andrea at our sister site Vibrant Wellness Journal points out USDA once again ignored the diet-environment connection in their new Dietary Guidelines.

This might sound a little bit nit-picky, right? Stay with me.

Federal Dietary Guidelines are supposed to help us make food choices that support our health. While problems like air and water pollution and climate change may not directly impact our health, these indirect effects of our food choices are too serious to ignore. Eating for health means eating for the planet. We need somewhere to live, y’all.

You can read Andrea’s piece on the new USDA Dietary Guidelines below. She connects the dots between health and environment.


Diet and Environment: How did the USDA Dietary Guidelines Miss the Connection?

USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Importantby Andrea Betroli, Vibrant Wellness Journal

A recent article on Grist let us know that new federal dietary guidelines have been released, though there is little to celebrate. And while the guidelines themselves might be slightly misguided (as the US government is in bed with meat and dairy lobbies), many were hoping this time around that USDA dietary guidelines would look at the environmental impact of our diet and how it relates to climate change. Alas, the connection between diet and environment was missed again.

“USDA nutritionist Eve Essery Stoody told Vice News that the federal food recommendations will be, as always, based on how diet affects human health, not the health of the planet.”

But as we face rising levels of climate change, health issues of epidemic proportions, and shortages of food and water, there is EVERY reason to assume that the health of the planet IS human health! Yet the USDA did not take the climate impact of our diet into consideration when creating the dietary guidelines. Interestingly, if we actually followed the USDA guidelines as written, there would be a 12% increase in dietary-related greenhouse gas emissions. As said by Tufts University professor Miriam Nelson, “in general, a dietary pattern that is higher in plant-based foods and lower in animal-based foods is more health-promoting and is associated with less environmental impact.” But we all know that the agribusiness is not cool with ditching the beef and dairy, regardless of the climate impact.

These standards will not be revised again until 2020. This means we have six more years of heart disease, diabetes, constipation along with contaminated water, animal cruelty and other devastating environment impacts of a diet focused on animal foods. In fact, despite overwhelming evidence that beef and other animal foods are related to ill health and a range of lifestyle diseases, the beef industry is still asking for money to promote more meat consumption with a revised ‘checkoff’ program, totally dismissing the connection between diet and environment.

But here’s how to get out of it: simply don’t follow the USDA guidelines! While it would have been awesome for the government to acknowledge the health and environmental issues with animal foods, most of us can ignore it (although it does factor into things like school lunch programs and food stamps).

There is a new-ish guideline that illustrates how you can eat best for your body and for the planet, named the Double Pyramid Diet. This is exactly what needs to be written into the USDA guidelines, but more importantly, shared with everyone who cares about the environment. As you can see in the double pyramid, the foods that are best for our bodies are also the best for the planet. See how that’s a win-win?

USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Important

Having a diet based on foods that are healthful (vegetables, grains and legumes) is also the most beneficial for the planet, as these foods have lower impact with reduced water usage, reduced pollution and more. Likewise, the foods that are least healthy (meats and dairy, and processed foods) come with the most impact: polluted waters, soil, unhealthy animals and a huge mess of greenhouse gas emissions.

We have hundreds of recipes here on VWJ that can help you eat lower on the pyramid and chew your way to a healthier planet. Check out our sister site Eat Drink Better for hundreds more recipes and lots of good food news to inspire you to make these changes. Let’s get started, shall we?

Images via Shutterstock and Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition

About The Author

5 thoughts on “USDA Dietary Guidelines are Missing Something Important”

      1. Sorry about that! They haven’t been released, but they have announced that they’re going to be once again ignoring the diet-environment connection. I’ve edited the intro to reflect that it’s an announcement, not a release. I apologize if that felt misleading; it was not meant to be.

  1. Yes, this is important but it’s not either or. The government doesn’t control what we put in our mouths. That is our responsibility. Anyone who has been there knows diets don’t work in the long run. To live healthy we need to change our lifestyle. That is the only way.

    1. I agree that they don’t control what we eat. Dietary guidelines aren’t governing anything, they’re just guidelines. Like it or not, folks put stock in those recommendations. A lot of consumers aren’t aware of the diet-environment-health connection, and leaving that out of the guidelines misses a great chance to educate people about their food choices. Like you say, we need to change our lifestyle. To do that, we also need all of the facts, so that we can make truly informed decisions at the grocery store.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top