Better eating insects

Published on June 22nd, 2014 | by Jill Ettinger

1

No, You Won’t Have to Resort to Eating Insects in the Future

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on TumblrTweet about this on Twitter

eating insects

Doesn’t it seem like lately every single food-related website is bombarding you with hideous images of piles of crickets or worms being touted as “the food of the future”? Blech. Eating insects doesn’t seem like something to strive for in our future—more like a relic from our less-evolved past.

I get it; as far as protein sources go, eating insects makes for a more humane and less messy option than slaughtering billions of pigs, chickens and cows year after year.

I’m not the first to point out that America’s meat obsession has gotten way out of control. Countless studies also point to the inherent benefits of eating fewer meat (and dairy) products. Not to mention the antibiotics and growth hormones fed to these animals to make them grow bigger faster. Or the pesticide and herbicide sprayed G.M.O.’s fed to the animals in their unnatural grain diets.

From an environmental standpoint, eating crickets instead of chickens makes sense, too, sort of. Factory farms are extremely damaging to the land, air and water, where insects can be raised in less intensive environments. But is it the most environmentally friendly diet? Recently Mother Jones noted that “universal veganism”—meaning if every human gave up meat, eggs and dairy products—“would reduce agriculture-related carbon emissions by 17 percent, methane emissions by 24 percent, and nitrous oxide emissions by 21 percent by 2050. Universal vegetarianism would result in similarly impressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.”

And let’s also not forget that people around the world do eat insects already on a regular basis. But that doesn’t make it any less like…eating insects.

Yes, eating insects may be one answer to factory farming, but so is adopting a vegan diet. Worms and crickets contain protein, but so do less leggy lentils. Chickpeas, avocados, brown rice.

Hopefully our future does contain a lot less meat—not just for our own health, but for the animals too. And even though they’re icky, insects are animals—animals we really don’t need to be eating.

Bug sandwich image via Shutterstock

Keep up with the latest sustainable food news by signing up for our free newsletter. CLICK HERE to sign up!



Get social!
Use the buttons to connect with EDB on some of your favorite social networks!

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

Jill Ettinger is co-director of Eat Drink Better. She is the senior editor at EcoSalon.com and OrganicAuthority.com. A focus on food, herbs, wellness and world cultural expressions, Jill explores what our shifting food, healing systems and creative landscapes will look, sound and taste like in the future. Stay in touch on Twitter @jillettinger and .



  • Vicki

    I could not agree more. Whenever I use an app to determine how many calories I’m consuming and the nutritional information for the food I’m eating, I am amazed by the amount of protein I am taking in. Carnivores and omnivores think that we are being deprived of protein when it is just not true. I hope I never have to make the choice between starvation and insects.

Back to Top ↑