Food Safety baby BPA

Published on November 26th, 2010 | by Zachary Shahan

5

Chemical Industry Shuts Down Proposed Law to Protect Kids from BPA

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on TumblrTweet about this on Twitter

cute baby picture

The toxic chemical bisphenol A, or BPA, has been scientifically linked to adverse health conditions in over 200 studies. Just recently, I reported on one showing a clear link between BPA exposure and decreases in sperm quality and quantity. But BPA has also been linked to prostate cancer, breast cancer, birth defects, early puberty in girls, diabetes, digestive issues, and obesity.

BPA is especially threatening to babies and young children because their bodies are developing so fast.

For these reasons, there was reportedly broad bi-partisan support to include a ban on BPA in baby bottles and infant feeding cups in the Food Safety Modernization Act… until the chemical industry quickly swooped in and turned things around (who knows how?).

American Chemistry Council Blocks BPA Ban in Baby Bottles

The American Chemistry Council blocked introduction of this ban into the Act a couple weeks ago and it was all over from there, despite organizations representing 40 million Americans, including the Breast Cancer Fund, National WIC Association, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Consumer’s Union, Environmental Working Group (EWG), the Blue-Green Alliance, the American Nurses Association, and U.S. PIRG, supporting the ban.

As Janet Nudelman, policy director at the Breast Cancer Fund (the organization leading the national coalition that advocated for the ban), soberly states:

It’s a sad day when the chemical industry muscles out children’s health and safety. Once again we see the American Chemistry Council prioritize the profits of chemical companies over the public’s health.  It is not fair that our nation’s children are on the losing side of this equation.

Senator Feinstein, also a key champion of the proposed ban, disappointedly but with determination as well said:

The evidence against BPA is mounting, especially its harmful effects on babies and children who are still developing.  I very much regret that the chemical industry puts a higher priority on selling chemicals than on the health of infants.  I will not cease in my efforts to remove BPA from products where it can harm human health, and I urge consumers to vote with their pocketbooks by refusing to purchase products that contain BPA.

Let’s hope that sooner or later these informed and concerned leaders will be able to get passed the chemical industry’s powerful lobby.

You Can Help the U.S. Drop BPA

Of course, there’s something you can do to help remove BPA from our society, even without a legal ban: don’t buy products with BPA in them. And, especially if you have a baby, buy BPA-free baby products.

Numerous large companies have already taken the lead on this issue in response to consumer demand or common sense, so don’t worry that your efforts can’t have an impact. Leading retailers like CVS, Kmart, Safeway, Toys R Us, and Walmart have dedicated themselves to not selling BPA-containing baby bottles. And even chemical manufacturer Sunoco will no longer sell BPA to companies making products for kids under the age of 3.

We definitely need a nationwide ban on this chemical, for all ages, but until then, you can do your part by shopping responsibly.

Connect with me on FacebookStumbleUponTwitter, or Care2.

Photo Credit: dulcelife via flickr (CC license)

Keep up with the latest sustainable food news by signing up for our free newsletter. CLICK HERE to sign up!



Get social!
Use the buttons to connect with EDB on some of your favorite social networks!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is the director of CleanTechnica, the most popular cleantech-focused website in the world, and Planetsave, a world-leading green and science news site. He has been covering green news of various sorts since 2008, and he has been especially focused on solar energy, electric vehicles, and wind energy since 2009. Aside from his work on CleanTechnica and Planetsave, he's the founder and director of Solar Love, EV Obsession, and Bikocity. To connect with Zach on some of your favorite social networks, go to ZacharyShahan.com and click on the relevant buttons.



  • http://www.ewg.org Alex F

    The chemical industry lobbyists didn’t have to mount a grassroots campaign or organize millions of people to flood lawmakers’ offices with phone calls, letters and emails. There were no paid ads in newspapers, Capitol Hill press conferences or a push for favorable media coverage of the industry’s position on BPA. Those are the kinds of tools the public interest community employs to get its concerns heard by members of Congress.

    Nope. Just a phone and a few phone numbers for several Republican senators was all it took for the American Chemistry Council to kill a bipartisan agreement to remove this endocrine-disrupting chemical and possible carcinogen from baby bottles.

  • http://Web kimbenet

    Companies do give out samples. They are looking to put their products in potential consumers’ hands. They wouldn’t do it if it didn’t work.

  • Emme

    PROFIT BEFORE PEOPLE:

    The Chemical Companies are a HUGE lobby that has a strong hold in Washington. The concern is over profits and lawsuits. The Profit will always go before the health of the people in this sick world

    This is the very same thing they have done with Diabetes and Obesity. The Chemicals cause the problem and the Druggies profit.

  • http://Web lauren

    hi, i think it’s a typo where you state BPA is linked to healthy digestion.

    • http://community.importantmedia.org/beckyanne/ Becky Striepe

      Oh whoops! Great catch, Lauren. We’ll get that corrected right away.

Back to Top ↑