Agri-business News Is Monsanto Roundup Killing Our Soil

Published on April 21st, 2010 | by Zachary Shahan

16

Is RoundUp Killing the Soil?

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone





There is still a great debate on whether or not Monsanto’s genetically modified crops and heavily used pesticides are safe. But has it already been proven that the company is severely damaging our soils?

Monsanto is an $11.8 billion/year industrial agriculture behemoth. Aside from numerous environmental and health concerns regarding its pesticides, genetically modified seeds and so on, there is also great concern from farmers in India to educated citizens in the US that it is trying to develop a worldwide monopoly on the growing of food (something it has basically stated itself).

Its monopolistic goals and efforts regarding one of the basic necessities of life is a story that could fill a book, but one piece of it is Monsanto’s heavily used pesticide Roundup and the genetically modified “RoundupUpReady” seeds it has created to go with this pesticide.

One thing that apparently was not thoroughly considered is what effect tons and tons of this pesticide (and perhaps the crops) would have on non-RoundUpReady soil. USDA scientist Dr. Robert Kremer has spent 15 years studying Monsanto’s RoundUp herbicide and says, “This could be something quite big. We might be setting up a huge problem.”

Are Monsanto’s Genetically Modified Crops Safe? Who knows?

One of the major problems with identifying if genetically modified crops are safe and healthy is that Monsanto and related corporations do not allow independent testing of their products and not even the US government tests them before they approve them.

“We don’t have a robust enough regulatory system to be able to give us a definitive answer about whether these crops are safe or not. We simply aren’t doing the kinds of tests we need to do to have confidence in the safety of these crops,” said Doug Gurian-Sherman, a scientist who served on an FDA biotech advisory subcommittee from 2002 to 2005.

Even supporters of these crops acknowledge that there is a serious lack of scientific inquiry into these matters.

Carey Gillam of Reuters reports:

The developers of these crop technologies, including Monsanto and its chief rival DuPont, tightly curtail independent scientists from conducting their own studies. Because the companies patent their genetic alterations, outsiders are barred from testing the biotech seeds without company approvals.

Unlike several other countries, including France, Japan and Germany, the United States has never passed a law for regulating genetically modified crop technologies. Rather, the government has tried to incorporate regulation into laws already in existence before biotech crops were developed.

The result is a system that treats a genetically modified fish as a drug subject to Federal Drug Administration oversight, and a herbicide-tolerant corn seed as a potential “pest” that needs to be regulated by USDA’s Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) before its sale to farmers.

The process is also costly and time-consuming for biotech crop developers, which might need to go through three different regulators before commercializing a new product.

Nina Fedoroff, a special adviser on science and technology to the U.S. State Department, which promotes GMO adoption overseas, said even though she is confident that biotech crops are ultimately safe and highly beneficial for agriculture and food production, an improved regulatory framework could help boost confidence in the products.

“We preach to the world about science-based regulations but really our regulations on crop biotechnology are not yet science-based,” said Fedoroff in an interview. “They are way, way out of date. In many countries scientists are much better represented at the government ranks than they are here.”

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, a former governor of top U.S. corn producing state Iowa, also said he recognizes change is needed. The USDA is in fact developing new rules for regulating genetically modified crops but the process has dragged out now for more than six years amid heavy lobbying from corporate interests and consumer and environmental groups.

For further discussion of lawsuits brought up on this matter, read Reuter’s full piece on this matter: “Special Report: Are regulators dropping the ball on biocrops?“.

One major opponent to GM crops in India is Tiruvadi Jagadisan, a former managing director of Monsanto’s India operations who worked with the company for 15 years. He says that there are “very many legitimate concerns about the safety of GM food crops for humans, animals and the environment” and, regarding a GM eggplant that India recently decided to keep out of its country, he said that Monsanto did not give “accurate information to the public”.

Again, a book or two could be written on this topic, but let’s get back to the issue of soil for now.

Up Next: Data on Roundup’s effects on our soil.


Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is the director of CleanTechnica, the most popular cleantech-focused website in the world, and Planetsave, a world-leading green and science news site. He has been covering green news of various sorts since 2008, and he has been especially focused on solar energy, electric vehicles, and wind energy for the past four years or so. Aside from his work on CleanTechnica and Planetsave, he's the Network Manager for their parent organization – Important Media – and he's the Owner/Founder of Solar Love, EV Obsession, and Bikocity. To connect with Zach on some of your favorite social networks, go to ZacharyShahan.com and click on the relevant buttons.



16 Responses to Is RoundUp Killing the Soil?

  1. Pingback: Flickr Getty Deal to Be Limited to 2,500 Images at Launch (See Update Below) | Design Email Newsletters

  2. Pingback: Fab Fabrics: Sustainable Denim from Clariant – Crafting a Green World

  3. Pingback: Fab Fabrics: Sustainable Denim from Clariant

  4. Pingback: Amber waves of (genetically modified) grain « The Metropolis Mind

  5. Pingback: GM and Anti-GM Groups Unhappy with EU Proposal : Eat. Drink. Better.

  6. Pingback: Eating Vegan: The Soy Dilemma, Part Two : Eat. Drink. Better.

  7. If only more people would hear this.

  8. Pingback: Do Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds Pose a Problem for Farmers Using Roundup? : Eat. Drink. Better.

  9. Kelly says:

    At least one book has been written about it! For an inspiring kick in the pants, check out Organic Manifesto by Maria Rodale, granddaughter of the original publisher of Organic Farming and Gardening magazine, founded in 1942. Her family’s been fighting this fight for over 50 years: http://www.amazon.com/Organic-Manifesto-Farming-Planet-World/dp/1605294853

  10. Tim Sorsdahl says:

    Seeing is believing;
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2qVNK6zFgE

    You can see that its the CO2 emissions which is actually helping fertilize crops. Roundup and other chemicals are building in toxins in the soil that will effect our lifes, and the genetic varieties of GMO's also threaten our way of life moving forward.

    Global warming based on CO2 is a scam. CO2 is carbon dioxide, they say its a global warming gas but CO2 is also dry ice, LOL and you see dry ice on other planets so I dont fear the earth heading into a furnace.

    Even water is a global warming gas according to the IPCC, yet water is also ice.

    So there you have it, we need to spend less money on chasing global warming scams and focus instead on toxins 2-4,D, agent orange and Monsanto's seeds and Glyphosate killing chemicals and seeds.

    The Hazards of Using Monsanto's GMO "BT Cotton"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RPwMD7GXTk

  11. Dennis says:

    Zachary,

    If any of what you are saying is true, wouldn’t it make sense that it wouldn’t just be speculation after 13 years and billions of acres? Is there a “statue of limitations” on saying the sky is falling?

  12. Mariska van Aalst says:

    At least one book has been written about it! For an inspiring kick in the pants, check out Organic Manifesto by Maria Rodale, granddaughter of the original publisher of Organic Farming and Gardening magazine, founded in 1942. Her family’s been fighting this fight for over 50 years: http://www.amazon.com/Organic-Manifesto-Farming-Planet-World/dp/1605294853

  13. Dana B says:

    Great post, Zachary! It’s shocking that our country’s regulations on this are so relaxed.

    Maria Rodale’s recent book, ‘Organic Manifesto’ is right in line with your thinking here. I highly recommend it.

    I’m curious to hear your thoughts on what we, as individual citizens, can do to combat such a huge problem. Voicing concerns to government officials is one step but what about local solutions?

  14. Steve Savage says:

    There are some subtle trace nutrient issues that are manageable. The fact that yields have been increasing without increases in fertilization suggest that soils are far from “killed.” In fact, to the extent that RR technology is enabling more no-till, it is really good for soil health. The biggest risk is resistance development in weeds and that is going to require some careful management

  15. Zachary Shahan says:

    Steve,

    From what I have learned, it is not just speculation. But some scientists claim they have proven one thing and others claim they have proven the opposite, so until they all agree nothing is confirmed (in the scientific community or the public who listen to it).

    I will cover more of what other scientists and studies have found in the future, but for now, this is one top agricultural researcher’s findings regarding soil health, nutrient uptake and other related factors.

  16. Steve Savage says:

    Zachary,

    If any of what you are saying is true, wouldn’t it make sense that it wouldn’t just be speculation after 13 years and billions of acres? Is there a “statue of limitations” on saying the sky is falling?

Back to Top ↑