Consider Cutting the Meat Out
In an act of precognition, Mark Seall wrote a post today on EcoWorldly raising a number of questions about vegetarianism. While it would be near impossible to address all of his questions in one post, I do want to get the conversation started. I call his post precognitive because it provides a perfect segue to promote an event happening tomorrow: The Great American Meatout.
Every Spring, thousands of activists and educators get together at events all over the world to raise awareness of vegetarian diets. Despite the event’s name, it has in fact grown into an international phenomenon. You can find a calendar of events here to see what’s going on near you. This is certainly a great place to start in terms of resources, and I plan to address that further in my next post.
For today I want to look at Mark’s question, “Should we be eating animals in the first place?” Here’s my take…
There are three basic issues when it comes to looking at vegetarianism and veganism: health, animal rights, and the environment. Given the nature of this blog, I’m going to focus on the latter. Livestock production contributes to a number of hot button environmental issues, including:
- Climate Change: A 2006 study from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations found that meat production contributes 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, which is larger than the automobile industry. (Source: Vegan Outreach)
- Desertification: While livestock itself contributes to this problem by overgrazing land, the larger problem is producing enough food to feed these animals. It takes approximately 2,500 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef, and about 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of wheat. Not only is the biological inefficiency staggering, but farmland all across the U.S. and other countries is going dry. (Source: VegSource.com)
- Pollution from Factory Farms: The enormous amounts of animal waste produced in small areas by factory farms contributes to water contamination and air pollution. Studies have found these effects leading to death in local fish populations and disease in residents living near these farms, not to mention health effects on workers. (Source: Sierra Club)
There are a number of other environmental impacts caused by the meat industry, and I’ll provide some more resources at the end of this post. But many of you may say, “These issues apply to factory farms. I only eat grassfed, locally-raised, organic meat.”
Well, for one I’d question if that’s really true. Do you really know where all of your meat, eggs, and dairy products come from? If you do, more power to you! But unless you cook every meal at home, this seems near impossible. Secondly, this ignores health, and many animal rights concerns. And finally, I ask, how sustainable is this? If you truly believe that eschewing factory farms for small, local alternatives is the answer, then we as a society sure need to cut down on the amount of animal products in our diet. Learning more about ways to at least supplement your lifestyle with vegetarian or vegan meals is key.
The Great American Meatout encourages people to try going vegetarian for the day tomorrow. I say, try to challenge yourself further — try going vegan for the day, or for a week! And that’s why tomorrow I’ll be focusing on another of Mark’s questions, “Do you have any suggestions on managing the conversion to vegetarianism now that half the food on my plate is off limits?” Boy, do I.
For further reading on the environmental impacts of the animal industry, I recommend Vegan Outreach, Vegan Action, and former cattle rancher Howard Lyman’s first book, Mad Cowboy, available for preview on Google Books.
Millie–
This is a complex topic, and the points you raise (as well as those raised by Beth) speak to that complexity.
On your last point: I get very uneasy when we start arguing “shoulds,” as that’s the kind of debate that will likely fall on deaf ears, as Beth mentioned above. Food choices are a part of our identity: not just our personal identity, but our familial and cultural identities, also. Whether they should or not, most people will react with hostility to such arguments… If we can provide options that allow for a lighter impact, that’s a step forward.
I like the tone of Sharon’s original post, as it asks people to consider an option, and provides some facts about that option. That’s empowering. It may end up leading to the question you ask. But even if it doesn’t, it encourages people to look at how their food choices align with there values, and to adjust accordingly. I think if we approach people from that perspective, we’re much more likely to see changes in how people eat (as well as how they act in other areas of their lives).
Best,
Jeff
Wonderful and thought provoking comments from people who show they care. Kudos to all posters.
We are in a brave new world with large and concentrated populations who spend a majority of their lives in environments extensively engineered by man. Do the best you can for the world you live in.
I’m an athletic male who used to scauff at vegetarians and had never heard of a vegan. I now save both environmental resources and approx 90 lives a year by not eating meat.
It’s amazing what conclusions came from the diverse and brilliant minds of Albert Einstein & Ghandi.
Do it for your health. Do it for other species. Do it for our world.
True, much good thought here. Jeff, well said. It’s about making informed choices and better choices whether you are vegan, vegetarian or an omnivore.
Thanks, Jeff. It’s hard to answer a “should we” question, without getting into dictating morals. That’s why I tried to focus on the environmental aspects, so that people can make their own informed decisions based on the variety of factors that go into it.
For me, personally, the question of “should I eat this” does follow suit with Millie’s reasoning. Should I eat this? Not if there’s a better alternative. My goal is to make the alternatives more accessible, easy, and appealing.
Thanks to everyone who’s contributed to a great discussion about a topic that can be at times very emotional.
great discussion here, really! jeff, i think i see what you’re saying about shoulds and should-nots, and their potential to make people uneasy and to be off-putting. but if you’ll remember, i didn’t actually bring up the notion of “should”, i was only echoing the topic of the post on which we’re commenting, which directly asks us: “Should we be eating animals in the first place?” you are right that people take their food choices very personally, and beth is right that you can’t just “ask” the omnivorous populace to go vegan just by telling them why you think they should. still, we should be able to have a discussion about it, share with each other what we know and debate the parts about which we might disagree. i think it is important that our beliefs are challenged from time to time (in a respectful manner, of course) because it is a good idea to re-assess our choices as we live and learn, and as new information is brought to light. at least i think so.
[...] Skip the meat. As if you didn’t need another reason to lower your meat intake, I also recently came across this health-related article on the 5 Worst [...]
[...] Posts About Animal Rigth Activists: Are You A Meat-Eating Environmentalist? Consider Cutting the Meat Out How to Go Vegan: Naturalpath Sits Down With the Authors of Skinny Bitch Image Credit: Herry+ at [...]
[...] a Toyota Camry to the Toyota Prius, hybrid. University of Chicago, 2006 study Relevant GO posts: Consider Cutting the Meat Out Halal: The Original Ethical Meat Eating? 9 Money-Saving Tips to Eating Greener Tags: farm, Food, [...]
[...] Consider Cutting the Meat Out Tags: activism, animal rights, Canada, factory farming, Farm Sanctuary, North America, Walk for Animals Add a comment or question Recommend this post Share/Email Stumble It yahooBuzzShowBranding=0;yahooBuzzBadgeType=”text”;yahooBuzzArticleHeadline=”Farm Sanctuary’s 2008 Walk for Farm Animals”;green_options321:http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/15/farm-sanctuarys-2008-walk-for-farm-animals/ « Previous post [...]
[...] Consider Cutting the Meat Out Tags: Add new tag, agriculture, cattle, chicken, epa, manure, meat, methane, pigs Add a comment or question Recommend this post Share/Email Stumble It yahooBuzzShowBranding=0;yahooBuzzBadgeType=”text”;yahooBuzzArticleHeadline=”EPA to Give Factory Farms a Free Pass on Emissions”;green_options321:http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/24/epa-to-give-factory-farms-a-free-pass-on-emissions/ « Previous post Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue [...]